Kale and kombucha not included
This article was made possible because of the generous support of DAME members. We urgently need your help to keep publishing. Will you contribute just $5 a month to support our journalism?
Man Bun Ken™ truly arrived at the perfect moment. On Tuesday, Mattel unveiled a slew of new Ken dolls that are more diverse than ever, and one in particular captured the heart of the meme-obsessed Internet: Man Bun Ken.
KENS WITH MAN BUNS, THIS IS NOT A DRILL pic.twitter.com/FoPRwk0ZKG
— Emily A. Cummins (@emilyacummins) June 20, 2017
With political hot takes flying faster than the speed of light yesterday, Man Bun Ken™ became a perfect stand-in for every obnoxious, mansplaining dudebro that you’ve ever had to suffer through conversations with.
“I just don’t like Hillary, and we really need a 3rd party in this country. That’s why I voted for Gary Johnson.” pic.twitter.com/4K87CuLGoC
— Devon Handy (@DevonHandy) June 21, 2017
Democrat Jon Ossoff losing a closely-contested special election in the deeply-red Georgia 6th? Man Bun Ken™ has thoughts!
“Ossoff should’ve won this seat easily.” pic.twitter.com/RM3m92lopo
— Sarah Lerner (@SarahLerner) June 21, 2017
“A 1.5% special election loss by a Dem in a heavily GOP district obviously means the people are pining for socialism” pic.twitter.com/Vigo0Qm1lV
— E (@RealEthanHolmes) June 21, 2017
“We Democrats must put up my kind of dogmatic insufferable candidate to stop losing in GOP districts (although I’m not a Democrat).” pic.twitter.com/Vda8yBCoWB
— Al Giordano (@AlGiordano) June 21, 2017
Weird how I don’t see any man-bun pundits arguing that Parnell’s strong showing means Dems should run more anti-tax Goldman Sachs alums.
— Allan Brauer (@allanbrauer) June 21, 2017
But why go in hard on Ossoff when you could just blame a woman instead?
“Since neither Hillary or Chelsea are running for office, Ossoff’s thin loss in a 40-year GOP district means we have to scapegoat Pelosi.” pic.twitter.com/5WsDP2WCZd
— Al Giordano (@AlGiordano) June 21, 2017
“We will win easily. All we have to do is throw aside every woman and person of color in existence” https://t.co/yKomzJV2AP
— JeremyConstantinople (@smartflexin) June 21, 2017
If you hadn’t already observed, Man Bun Ken™ hates “identity politics!”
“Black Twitter is weaponizing identity politics to take focus away from the only issue that really matters, class solidarity” pic.twitter.com/hsAJViICuC
— Marcus H. Johnson (@marcushjohnson) June 20, 2017
Let’s try for an anti-abortion Democrat next time, the deluded guy said. That way we can repel our base and lose by even more. pic.twitter.com/tzOw8T3H2k
— Erin Matson (@erintothemax) June 21, 2017
“Check out my piece over at Salon about the menace of neoliberal identitarianism.” pic.twitter.com/vlQtK9bjT9
— Donna Gratehouse (@DonnaDiva) June 20, 2017
“I TOTALLY want a woman President, just not *this* woman. You’ve already waited 241 years, what’s 4 more?” pic.twitter.com/NJJoUWT6G1
— Molly (@isteintraum) June 20, 2017
And is convinced that the man who lost the Democratic primary could have won the general election (the logistics of electoral politics be damned!).
I don’t even own Mattel’s new man bun Ken Doll but he already told me the dangers of processed food and how Bernie would have beaten Trump. pic.twitter.com/rjxQQFiEfI
— Sully Sullivan (@Mikey_Sul) June 20, 2017
Man-bun Ken doll just interrupted me to tell me that Bernie would have won. pic.twitter.com/Mnu8pAXV7F
— J.D. Altman (@NicCageMatch) June 20, 2017
Through it all, Man Bun Ken™ assures you he’s definitely a feminist.
Man-bun Ken thinks having a mother makes him a feminist pic.twitter.com/mW5tOavC6G
— Ziwe (@ziwe) June 20, 2017
“You’re not like most girls” pic.twitter.com/6rTQ2DoPjT
— Emily (@Therosyone) June 20, 2017
“I’m not a feminist. I’m a humanist.” pic.twitter.com/eMqqBSe6Su
— Candice Aiston (@CandiceAiston) June 20, 2017
Never change, Man Bun Ken.™ We have too much fun satirizing you on Twitter dot com.
Before you go, we hope you’ll consider supporting DAME’s journalism.
Today, just tiny number of corporations and billionaire owners are in control the news we watch and read. That influence shapes our culture and our understanding of the world. But at DAME, we serve as a counterbalance by doing things differently. We’re reader funded, which means our only agenda is to serve our readers. No both sides, no false equivalencies, no billionaire interests. Just our mission to publish the information and reporting that help you navigate the most complex issues we face.
But to keep publishing, stay independent and paywall free for all, we urgently need more support. During our Spring Membership drive, we hope you’ll join the community helping to build a more equitable media landscape with a monthly membership of just $5.00 per month or one-time gift in any amount.