The unanimous vote says zones infringe on protesters' First Amendment rights. Since when do those cover intimidation and harassment?
We urgently need your help. DAME reports the stories that need to be told, from perspectives that aren’t heard enough. In times of crisis it is even more critical that these voices are not overlooked, but COVID-19 has impacted our ability to keep publishing. Please support our mission by joining today to help us keep reporting.
The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that the Massachusetts law instituting a 35-foot-buffer zone around abortion clinics violates the First Amendment. The Massachusetts buffer zone was enacted because of past violence at the state’s 11 reproductive health clinics. In 1994, a gunman went on a shooting rampage at two Planned Parenthoods in Brookline, Massachusetts, wounding five and killing two.
So, why strike it down now? Why strike down a law protecting women when the War on Women is just heating up? (I can hear Scott Walker cracking his knuckles on the corner.) Because, well, it’s just un-American, it’s not what we do on Main Street. “Petitioners wish to converse with their fellow citizens about an important subject on the public streets and sidewalks—sites that have hosted discussions about the issues of the day throughout history,” Chief Justice John Roberts writes. “While the state has an interest in public safety,” it “pursued those interests by the extreme step of closing a substantial portion of a traditional public forum to all speakers.”
Well, gee, I feel sort of ashamed of myself now. It’s tradition. It’s not harassment. No one is going to try and garrote anyone with a rosary. It’s just like the after-worship coffee hour at church. These anti-choice activists just want to converse with the folks who are going into the Planned Parenthoods and abortion clinics—just wanna chat, share some pecan pie, along with the love of Jesus Christ and the promise that should you choose to have an abortion you will suffer, oh how you will suffer, demons will plague you, tear your clothing and terrorize you to the end of your days.
I guess the concern is that if protesters aren’t able to scream, Burn in hell baby killer! right up in your face, if they aren’t close enough so that you can see the foam dripping from their jaws, take in the full fury of their spittle, smell the reeking brimstone on their breath, as they hiss God hates you! and force a baby doll nailed to a bloody crucifix up in your grill they aren’t getting their message across.
It’s important that these lady-hating protesters can exercise their right to inflict maximum trauma on these vulnerable women as well as their partners, their parents, their friends as they try to make their way into a reproductive health center. These Fetuses First Women Last! protesters must be in close enough proximity to shove grisly photos of aborted fetuses in the faces of those entering the clinic, close enough to grab a woman by the arm and pull her aside (just to converse!): FYI—if you go through with this you will be sterile. LOL! Or in their misogynistic zeal tackle her to the sidewalk (just to converse!).
Listen why do we even need buffer zones if all anti-choice protesters want to do is converse? Because that’s simply not true. They don’t want to converse, they want to stop women from exercising their right to a safe, legal abortion, by any means necessary. And they don’t have a right to.
We urgently need your help!
Covid-19 has dramatically impacted our ability to keep publishing. DAME is 100% reader funded and without additional support, we can’t keep publishing. Become a member at DAME today to help us continue reporting and shining a light on the stories that need to be told, from perspectives that aren’t heard enough. Every dollar we receive from readers goes directly into funding our journalism. Please become a member today!
(If you liked this article and just want to make a one-time donation, you can do that here)